TESTIMONY AS A SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE

 

TESTIMONY AS A SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE

"You can share your testimony in many ways, by the words you speak, by the example you set, by the manner in which you live your life."

We get a wonderful number of our beliefs from what others tell us. the testimony concerns how we should evaluate these beliefs. Here are the foremost questions. When are the beliefs justified, and why? When do they amount to knowledge, and why? 

The philosophy of testimony (also, epistemology of testimony) considers the character of language and knowledge's confluence, which occurs when beliefs are transferred between speakers and hearers through testimony. This definition could even be distinguished from the legal notion of testimony therein the speaker doesn't must make a declaration of the truth of the facts.

So much of what we all fathom the earth, e.g., history, science, politics, each other, etc., comes from the testimony of others. But while testimony is clearly a vital source of knowledge, specifying exactly how it's that we are ready to learn from a speaker’s say-so has proven to be a difficult task .

We get a decent number of our beliefs from what others tell us. The epistemology of testimony concerns how we must always evaluate this beliefs. The term testimony in philosophy is employed as label for the spoken or word, when this purports pass away the speaker’s or writer’s knowledge, conveying factual information or other truth. The key interest of testimony is as a source for individual human knowledge, alongside perception, memory, inference, and intuition. Account of testimony must be supplemented with an account of linguistic understanding both its psychology and its epistemology. First: Testimony as an epistemic kind should be more precisely delineated, and characterized. Second the acquisition of belief through testimony essentially involves understanding the content and force of a personality's activity made to minimum of one as audience. Third, an account of what makes belief acquired from testimony is justified, and knowledgeable. 

Testimony spreads information. It's also commonly agreed that it can transfer knowledge. Whether it can works as an epistemic source of understanding as a matter of dispute. However testimony certainly plays a pivotal role within the proliferation of understanding within the epistemic community. But how exactly will we learn, and also the way can we make advancements in understanding on the concept of one another’s words? And what we are ready to do to maximize the probability that the tactic of acquiring understanding from one another succeeds?

 “Our testimonies must run deep, with spiritual roots firmly embedded in the rock of revelation.” 

The philosophy of testimony considers the nature of language and knowledge’s confluence, which occurs when beliefs are transferred between speakers and hearers through testimony. Acquiring an attunement to testimony in both its simple and its extended forms is an important part of becoming a sophisticated epistemic agent who is able progressively to enhance his cognitive contact with reality by combining the deliverances of testimony with those of perception, memory and reasoning. In order to be justified in accepting a speaker’s testimony, we need to have positive reasons for believing that testimony is generally reliable. For example that I accepting the reports of others is a reliable way of forming my true beliefs.

At the end of my article testimony may be a useful source of knowledge and it's the capacity to urge knowledge, but it also gives appropriate weight to our nature as both socially indebted and individually rational creatures.

We should remember that bearing a heartfelt testimony is simply a beginning. We'd to bear a testimony , we wish to mean it, and most significantly we'd like consistently to live it. We want to both declare and live our testimonies.